Complete newbie to mx3's 1.8 V6 se on its way :)
-
ok cool. it is white in colour but like i said no half leather and according to the insurance company it is an SE. guess ill wait for the log book lol. white does seem to be a rare colour for these cars. there isnt a single one on ebay
-
@aa4bd4d733=daniel:
ok cool. it is white in colour but like i said no half leather and according to the insurance company it is an SE. guess ill wait for the log book lol. white does seem to be a rare colour for these cars. there isnt a single one on ebay
There's a Eunos Presso on ebay in white, quite good condition too
-
There was a second run of SEs - though I've no idea of the spec - at the same time as the Equipe (Noble Green) came out, which would be 1995/6. If I recall right, they were all either Clear White or that bluey-green colour (Sparkle Green on the MX-5/323… had a different name for the MX-3 I can never remember) but I don't recall what else they had that made them different to normal V6s.
-
i have bought one and its a uk model. love the sound of the engine
-
yeah mine must be from the second run. i looked on wiki and apparently they made 100 SE's in '96 only in white. i will paste below
In 1996, Mazda Europe produced 100 Mazda MX-3 V6 SEs. These had a leather and suede interior, and all had the clear White body colour. There were also a limited number of Mazda MX-3 V6 Equipes, with Sparkle Green Metallic or Noble Green exteriors.
doesnt say what else was different but never mind. :) im just happy to have one
-
**Yeah, that's not even close to true.
The original SE - 93/4 in Clear White - was a limited run, but I don't recall how many of them there were. They had the half leather, half light grey suede interior and a unique set of wheels (gunmetal, polished lip, five spokes, made to look like split rims, 15x7).
The Equipe - 95/6 in Noble Green - wasn't limited run, but was the range-topper. Came with all leather and some other interior I don't recall well (I have the idea in my head it was half leather, half suede with body-colour stitching), unique wheels (silver five spokes, similar, but not same, fake split rim look, 15x7).
The second SE was, I think, a trim level like the Equipe. No limited numbers beyond how they sold and I recall they came with the stock V6 5-spokes (15x6) rather than the 6-spokes and were white or the sparkle green colour.
Nonetheless, an MX-3 is an MX-3 is an MX-3. My SE is still an SE in name only as his interior is in my V6 (soon to be joined by his wheels) - and likely there's very few MX-3s left as they were when they left the factory, so whether yours is an SE or not, go enjoy it :D**
-
i will enjoy it when i pick it up. :) the garage i bought it off was kind enough to MOT it and it failed on all breaks and a fuel leak, all of which is being done for me at no cost :D I really cant wait to pick it up. will post a few pics up when i get it. gotta be honest i have never owned a white car before so gotta learn to keep it clean lol. and it does have the 5 spoke alloys the same as these:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1998-Mazda-MX-3-Coupe-1845cc-Petrol-/220639949269?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item335f2a71d5
its so nice to drive. what mods have you done to yours?
-
Red - my V6 - has only had an interior upgrade to SE (borrowed from Marvin, my SE) and slightly tweaked braking system (Mintex pads, Black Diamond grooved discs). Marvin - my SE - is in the middle of a slightly more stern package of changes which, for now, we'll gloss over, but they're well on the way and most of the parts are now in this country at least, if not on him.
-
lol marvin… making me laugh. i cant wait to start modding. might go for a spray job before i do anything. something similar to this:
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.kgsengineering.com/images/92_mx3aggressivecomplete.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.kgsengineering.com/vh238/c1_19/1992-1995%20Mazda%20MX-3-Full%20Body%20Kits.html&usg=__lNj528V9cobKGTV0S7oP1OVW28Y=&h=341&w=600&sz=31&hl=en&start=93&zoom=1&tbnid=y_vjG5es4nhcNM:&tbnh=102&tbnw=179&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmx3%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1345%26bih%3D573%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=370&ei=XfaHTJyULNC6jAfcoOSQCA&oei=TPaHTP3zK4PIswat7L2TCg&esq=6&page=6&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:5,s:93&tx=76&ty=77
sorry didnt realise the link was that long haha. this will be my first V6. i am hoping its economical. how much did you pay for your V6? double checked insurance and its defo an SE. like you said must be a later one. :)
-
I got Red in August 2003 for £3,250 and Marvin last May for £250 :D
-
bloody hell. you got a car as rare as that for pennys. nice one. :D bought mine for £800. it is fair tidy. bit of rust by the spoiler but nothing in the arches. i was just looking for some alloys on ebay. is the V6 tricky to work on? is it eco? sorry about all the questions. have you got any pics of your cars up? would love to take a ganders
-
**Marvin was a non-runner at the time. Couple of rust spots, broken windscreen, slightly gammy-sounding engine… The couple selling him had offers of £400 to break him (the interior and wheels were worth that), but they wanted him to be put back on the road and I was after an SE for a project.
Of course he's slightly more of a non-runner right now - he has no engine or gearbox (or wheels, suspension, exhaust, interior - you get the idea) - but before one rebuilds, one must first dismantle. He's in the stripped down, cleaning up stage right now :D
I have a Famine's Fleet thread, which has some of our other cars. And you may recognise the other red one, which has spent some considerable time in Banbury.
In terms of engine work itself, yes, the V6 is tricky. We did a cambelt change and it was bordering on gynaecology with the engine in place, but with a service manual to hand everything is easy enough in the end.
Economical? Red tends to run about 35mpg on longer journeys, 32mpg on average and high 20s if forced to bimble around town more regularly. It's about the same as an MX-5, only better on longer runs due to the better drag coefficient. We also have a 2.2 4-pot which gets about 32mpg on runs, a 2.3 V6 which runs close to 30mpg and a 2.5 straight six which just about breaks 30mpg, so Red is probably the most economical of the cars we have. Though as they say, your mileage may vary.**
-
@92e369c883=Famine:
And you may recognise the other red one, which has spent some considerable time in Banbury.
.Was the car from Banbury or is that where your from?
-
**Neither :D
But I visit Banbury on occasion (most recent was mid-August) and we loaned the car to a friend there for a couple of months - he was without a working car and Blue was sitting idle, not getting much use.**
-
@aa6cbebc99=Famine:
**Neither :D
But I visit Banbury on occasion (most recent was mid-August) and we loaned the car to a friend there for a couple of months - he was without a working car and Blue was sitting idle, not getting much use.**
cool, there are quite a few 3's around here, was thinking you was one of them.
-
There is a couple of mx3's where i live, all completely standard. i have never been a fan of small cars but i fell lin love with this one. i was looking to get an st24 but felt this would be a cheaper, more economical alternative. and if im honest, it feels just as quick. anyone had a go at an st24 in a mx3? (nothing illegal obviously :wink: )
-
An ST24 is no match for an MX-3 V6 - a Probe V6 with the same engine is a pound-for-pound match up to about 130mph and the MX-3 will walk all over a Cougar V6. An ST200 does much better and an ST220 is in a completely different league.
-
i gotta admit, when i took it for a test drive it got up to a ton pretty damn quick. i cant wait to take on all the little saxo/106 boys. they all think their cars are the best. thats what put me off small cars but the build quality of the mazda is pretty good from what could tell. i can tell that all you guys are passionate about your cars and its nice to talk to people with the same passion as myself. oh one more thing, is the sunroof a common thing to stop working on these as mine is not moving. i hope its just a fuse as not any mx3's in the scrappys round here. i checked out marvin on your page and he looks pretty clean. nice rides :)
-
it is a stock engine so hope it will beat an st24. got a friend that has one. according to the book it tops out at 133mph and the st tops out at 137. can anyone veryfy that 133 is the top speed for a stock 1.8 V6? i guess power to weight ratio would make the mazda quicker as mondeo is nearly 2 ton. mazda is 1140kg apparently :D
-
**The ST24 weighs just over 1.3 tonnes, while the MX-3 is 1.1 tonnes. On paper, the ST has the edge with power to weight - by a fraction. But it's long-geared (same as the Probe and MX-6) and, though torquier, has a peaky torque curve. It's slower to 60mph, a quarter-mile and 100mph. Anything with bends in favours the MX-3 unless the bends are very shallow and fast, where the Mondeo's longer wheelbase and lower polar moment will help it.
In theory, the MX-3 is aero limited (the air pressure in front of it exceeds the power it generates' ability to overcome it) to 141mph. Crunching the numbers, on the stock 15" wheels it's also gear limited (maximum engine speed in the longest gear) to 141mph. Disregard what the speedometer tells you - speedos are legally allowed up to a 10% overread and are not necessarily accurate at any speed.
Not familiar with sunroofs (or rather moonroofs - sunroof is glass, moonroof is a body panel) failing but a fuse would be the first place to check.**
